As NRA supporters love to say “Guns don’t kill people, People kill People” well they forget to mention that the killer had a GUN in his hands…in this case several guns in his hands…
The Connecticut shooter had these guns in his possession, all guns purchased legally by his mother:
Bushmaster Caliber .223 Remington: The civilian version of the weapon is used by U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan and some police forces in the United States.
Glock Caliber 9mm: semi-automatic pistol
Sig Sauer Caliber 9mm: semi-automatic pistol
The question is: WITHOUT THESE GUNS HOW MANY PEOPLE WOULD HE HAVE KILLED???
The second amendment states:
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
The second amendment protects our right to protect ourselves from corrupt governments or foe, But do we really need these types of guns to protect ourselves? to hunt?
Is this right more important to our society than the right of the people being hurt by them?
Ask yourself that…